I think these hold good even if the people vote No in the referendum on voting reform next May,
Christian Louboutin Evening, as seems increasingly likely, thanks mainly to the deepening conservatism of the Labour Party. Which is why there was a notable edge to the comments of Simon Hughes, Lib Dem deputy leader, in his interview with my colleague Matt Chorley today:
Cartoon: Peter Schrank, Independent on Sunday
My argument is: that the spending cuts might look very different in four years’ time; that David Cameron has an incentive to give the Lib Dems something to show for their partnership; and that hung parliaments are likely to continue to be the norm.*
It is an entirely winnable campaign but only if we are really clear that people defending first-past-the-post are Neanderthal. Now, they may be our colleagues in government, but it’s an indefensible, unfair, illogical minority activity to defend the first-past-the-post.
We have got to go in really hard. It’s no good pansying round the edge and saying, ‘Oh well,
http://kaokao.net/club/space.php?uid...blog&id=406531, the Tories have got a position,
http://ietbn.cn/showtopic-300793.aspx,
Cheap Christian Louboutin Platforms, it is perfectly understandable.’ If you can’t support the idea that preferential voting and voting positively, not negatively, and getting a majority of support in your area is progress,
http://www.marinapalmira.com/##############...ge.php?pos=-27, then really you haven’t arrived in the 21st century.
I have in the past suggested that Nick Clegg was an opportunist, and not a very good one.
Tagged in: electoral reform,
Christian Louboutin Pumps, nick clegg
Recent Posts on Eagle Eye Will this be how the eurozone ends?Look Back at the Royal RevengeMilitary "Failure" in Helmand and BasraTories cut Labour lead to one pointAmis on Hitch
Could he in fact be a principled,
http://www.sgcin.gov.cn/E_ReadNews.asp?NewsId=2755, tactically astute leader who is going to secure long-term advance for the Liberal Democrat cause?
*Update: Another apology; I meant to put in the link to Prof John Curtice’s article in Parliamentary Affairs,
Christian Louboutin shoes sale, in which he provides the evidence.
This is not number 388 in my long-running series of Questions to Which the Answer is No,
http://idrather.be/pg/blog/ghkham2u/...golden-studded, because I have an article in The Independent on Sunday today wondering whether he might avoid the fate that befell the Liberal party in the previous peace-time coalitions of 1895,
Cheap Christian Louboutin Sandals, 1918 and 1931. In each case the Liberal leadership was absorbed by the Conservatives – in governments that made bad policy decisions – and the rump of the party that survived much weakened.
Cheap Christian Louboutin Platforms, ‘
were consumption
Linear Mode
