Free Advertising Forums | Free Advertising Board | Post Free Ads Forum | Free Advertising Forums Directory | Best Free Advertising Methods | Advertising Forums - View Single Post - In his debut in Washington’s power struggles, Gingrich threw a bomb

**yesenwnkb** · 12-26-2011, 03:55 PM

Days earlier, Gingrich had dramatically walked out of the White House and was leading a very public rebellion against a deficit reduction and tax increase deal that Bush and top congressional leaders of both parties — including, they thought, Gingrich — had signed off on after months of tedious negotiations. The House was to vote on the deal the very next day.“We went over and I said [to Bush], ‘I’m really sorry that this is happening,’ and he said with as much pain as I’ve heard from a politician, ‘You’re killing us, you are just killing us.’ ”The photo was snapped, Gingrich and his wife took their seats for dinner “and both of us just felt like crying,” he said.Gingrich’s revolt highlighted a rift that persists to this day within <a href="http://www.branddiscountonline.com/burberry-nylon-shopper-in-black-p-19330.html">burberry tunic</a> the Republican Party, between a pragmatic establishment open to dealmaking and a more rigid conservative base that prefers purity over compromise. That split has benefited Gingrich at times during his political career, including in his current bid for president, as he is tied at the top of the Republican field with Mitt Romney, the establishment choice. The party divide <a href="http://www.womenfashionbag.com/mahina-amelia-clutch-p-18706.html">totally lv</a> also played out on Capitol Hill last week, when a group of conservatives in the House attempted to torpedo a deal struck between Senate Republicans and the White House over payroll taxes. In that case, House Speaker John A. Boehner (R-Ohio) backed down in the face of political pressure. In 1990, Gingrich did not.Gingrich’s actions both before and after his encounter with Bush showed a man willing, if not eager, to weaken the president and, as he put it, “to dismantle the old order.”Then the party whip and No. 2 Republican in the House, Gingrich and his followers took down the deal the next day, severely undercutting Bush and highlighting the betrayal of his famous “Read my lips: no new taxes” pledge. In some key respects, Gingrich’s revolt set the stage for Bush’s demise and eventual defeat — as well as the Republican takeover of the House in 1994 that catapulted Gingrich to the speakership.Gingrich’s defiance and high-visibility debut as provocateur in 1990 was a decisive moment for him. It was the first chance he had to exercise real political power, providing an early glimpse of the complexity and the contradictions that he has displayed since.Bush’s budget director, the late Richard G. Darman, said that the White House was not given serious notice that Gingrich would balk at the deal and that his revolt was “an act of political sabotage.” In one 1992 memo, Darman wrote in capital letters of the “1990 <a href="http://www.branddiscountonline.com/burberry-nylon-shopper-in-white-p-19332.html">burberry vest women</a> GINGRICH STAB IN THE BACK.”Gingrich was unrepentant, arguing that he had a higher purpose. “It was destructive,” he acknowledged, but necessary to stop Bush and others from making deals with Democrats.

12-26-2011, 03:55 PM	#1
yesenwnkb Captain Join Date: Oct 2011 Posts: 583	In his debut in Washington’s power struggles, Gingrich threw a bomb Days earlier, Gingrich had dramatically walked out of the White House and was leading a very public rebellion against a deficit reduction and tax increase deal that Bush and top congressional leaders of both parties — including, they thought, Gingrich — had signed off on after months of tedious negotiations. The House was to vote on the deal the very next day.“We went over and I said [to Bush], ‘I’m really sorry that this is happening,’ and he said with as much pain as I’ve heard from a politician, ‘You’re killing us, you are just killing us.’ ”The photo was snapped, Gingrich and his wife took their seats for dinner “and both of us just felt like crying,” he said.Gingrich’s revolt highlighted a rift that persists to this day within <a href="http://www.branddiscountonline.com/burberry-nylon-shopper-in-black-p-19330.html"><strong>burberry tunic</strong></a> the Republican Party, between a pragmatic establishment open to dealmaking and a more rigid conservative base that prefers purity over compromise. That split has benefited Gingrich at times during his political career, including in his current bid for president, as he is tied at the top of the Republican field with Mitt Romney, the establishment choice. The party divide <a href="http://www.womenfashionbag.com/mahina-amelia-clutch-p-18706.html"><strong>totally lv</strong></a> also played out on Capitol Hill last week, when a group of conservatives in the House attempted to torpedo a deal struck between Senate Republicans and the White House over payroll taxes. In that case, House Speaker John A. Boehner (R-Ohio) backed down in the face of political pressure. In 1990, Gingrich did not.Gingrich’s actions both before and after his encounter with Bush showed a man willing, if not eager, to weaken the president and, as he put it, “to dismantle the old order.”Then the party whip and No. 2 Republican in the House, Gingrich and his followers took down the deal the next day, severely undercutting Bush and highlighting the betrayal of his famous “Read my lips: no new taxes” pledge. In some key respects, Gingrich’s revolt set the stage for Bush’s demise and eventual defeat — as well as the Republican takeover of the House in 1994 that catapulted Gingrich to the speakership.Gingrich’s defiance and high-visibility debut as provocateur in 1990 was a decisive moment for him. It was the first chance he had to exercise real political power, providing an early glimpse of the complexity and the contradictions that he has displayed since.Bush’s budget director, the late Richard G. Darman, said that the White House was not given serious notice that Gingrich would balk at the deal and that his revolt was “an act of political sabotage.” In one 1992 memo, Darman wrote in capital letters of the “1990 <a href="http://www.branddiscountonline.com/burberry-nylon-shopper-in-white-p-19332.html"><strong>burberry vest women</strong></a> GINGRICH STAB IN THE BACK.”Gingrich was unrepentant, arguing that he had a higher purpose. “It was destructive,” he acknowledged, but necessary to stop Bush and others from making deals with Democrats.

Sponsored Links