Free Advertising Forums | Free Advertising Board | Post Free Ads Forum | Free Advertising Forums Directory | Best Free Advertising Methods | Advertising Forums - View Single Post - Nike Air Max TN Mens in White Black red

08-16-2011, 01:34 AM

What is the best food sources for coding CPU
CPUINTEL Core 2 Duo E6850 (3G L2 CAHCE 4M) Colorful NFORCE680I SLI motherboard heatsink Tunq Tower120 memory GSKILL F2-8500CL5D-2GBHK NVIDIA GEFORCE 8500GT graphics card in order to discuss this test we , the various sources for (different codes) in the same platform, namely what kind of system load, and let us know the code differences between the soft solution.

Babel is very, very loss of resources, you can see in the Core 2 duo E6850 Fengyun the most powerful CPU, the peak in the soft solution reached 82%, while the average occupancy is also 72%. While the general did not look at films, few will be multi-task, but hung up subtitles, then open BT and other background process,kobe bryant jerseys, making life difficult to ensure that E6850 can completely smooth playback Moreover, it is most powerful Core 2 Duo, so we come to a conclusion, Babel source of this film is not suitable for soft real solution.
Although the average of 007 ############ Royale, Flags of Our Fathers slightly lower than some, but the maximum occupancy rate is the most determined whether the card, coupled with the lowest occupancy is still higher than the one in ############ Royale, so we ############ Royale to determine the hardware requirements for a chip far better than Flags of Our Fathers. The Flags of Our Fathers Pirates of the Caribbean and are inextricably, if integrated H.264 is still in the Pirates of the Caribbean is one of the lowest occupancy rate. In fact, both the Royal
007, or Flags of Our Fathers, or the Pirates of the Caribbean, represent the latest 1080p H.264 high rate of CPU utilization, overall the side although there is no Babel metamorphosis, but also than the VC-1 come together above. And we see from the table, H.264 inter BABEL outside the other three sources in an average CPU utilization is not high on the VC-1 too much, just at the highest CPU usage will suddenly soaring, see the CPU occupancy H.264 curve can also be seen to this point,derrick rose jerseys, often winding paths of the.
VC-1 of the CPU occupancy rate change is small, only 20% of the maximum is also more compared to H.264 is much to be smooth, so long as the VC-1 has become so basic flow, it will not appear Card state.
MPEG-2 is really not to mention the CPU occupancy, and now the CPU occupancy QQ almost taller than him, no wonder there are old friends will VC-1/H.264 machine convert MPEG2 to make a.
Summary: CPU occupancy rate, Babel> 007 ############ Royale> Flags of Our Fathers> Pirates of the Caribbean> Diamond> Dreamgirls> Band of Brothers, H.264> VC-1> MPEG4
your the CPU, to meet the H264/VC-1/MPEG2 sources for soft solution to ask for?
CPU
INTEL Core 2 Duo E6850 (4M CACHE 333x9 DualCore)
INTEL Core 2 Duo E6750 (4M CACHE 333x8 DualCore)
INTEL Core 2 Duo E6300 (2M CACHE 266x7 DualCore)
INTEL Pentium E2160 (1M CACHE 200x9 DualCore)
INTEL PentiumD 915 (2Mx2 CACHE 200x14 DualCore)
INTEL Celeron M430 (512KB CACHE 200x9 SingelCore)
AMD ATHLON64 FX62 (1Mx2 CACHE 200x14 DualCore)
AMD ATHLON64x2 3600 + (512KBx2 CACHE 200x9.5 DualCore)
AMD ATHLON64 FX57 (1M CACHE 200x14 SingelCore)
AMD ATHLON64 4000 + (1M CACHE 200x12 SingelCore)
AMD ATHLON64 3000 + (512KB CACHE 200x9 SingelCore)
Colorful NFORCE680I SLI
board
Colorful C.N7050-PV
Colorful TA-690G AM2
radiator Tunq Tower120 memory GSKILL F2-8500CL5D-2GBHK Graphics NVIDIA GEFORCE 8500GT (not open without hardware ) The purpose of this test is to let everyone understand the different codes of the required minimum CPU frequency / type,cheap minesota twins jerseys, or find a property for their own CPU close to the condemnation, see the extract can not be smooth.
First of all, we want to define the concept of a smooth, and smooth it is different from most of the time not only smooth but also not card.
This will make two of the CPU usage requirements:
1: CPU average occupancy rate of not more than 80%, after more than 80% if there is another daemon running may lose the smooth feeling.
2: CPU can not exceed the maximum occupancy rate of 90%, even if you average occupancy rate of less than 50%, but 90% of cards at once may cause the screen shows card or Washington state.
so our test is carried out based on the above conditions. First, start with the MPEG2
start, all the above through the MPEG2 CPU test, even the weakest ATHLON 64 3000 + are completely fine.
VC-1, we have from the King to represent the highest level, we use a single core FX62 overclocked to 3G testing since our previous FX57 can not pass this test, the highest occupancy rate of 94% CPU, fine end.
In it we see a single core to levy the highest test frequency is only through it, to less than 1% CPU utilization called walking a fine line, this also means that not all single-core CPU overclocking will not be too measurement. Follow-up test PD915 is also possible to pass the test, but also just pass it.

H.264, we use to test the highest level of Babel. I tried to 3.4G over the Celeron M430 software solutions can not solve the problem, it seems that non-dual-core is not. The dual-core must also be competent leader, we see that E6750 to E6550 in the down-is still not running smoothly after the maximum has exceeded 93.75%, can only say that can not be qualified.
Babel needs more CPU e6750 can be truly considered smooth. Now we all pass the test of the CPU listed, so you need to understand all the sources for what kind of CPU. Encoding test (ie the highest occupied less than 90% CPU, an average of 80% or less) CPUMPEG2INTEL Core 2 Duo E6850
INTEL Core 2 Duo E6750
INTEL Core 2 Duo E6300
INTEL Pentium E2160
INTEL Pentium D 915
INTEL Celeron M430
AMD ATHLON64 FX62
AMD ATHLON64x2 3600 +
AMD ATHLON64 FX57
AMD ATHLON64 4000 +
AMD ATHLON64 3000 + VC-1INTEL Core 2 Duo E6850
INTEL Core 2 Duo E6750
INTEL Core 2 Duo E6300
INTEL Pentium E2160
INTEL Pentium D 915
AMD ATHLON64 FX62
AMD ATHLON64x2 3600 + H.264INTEL Core 2 Duo E6850
INTEL Core 2 Duo E6750
AMD ATHLON64 FX62
video acceleration graphics core frequency has no use? Need to look at the video card does not need to buy high?
CPUINTEL Core 2 Duo E6300 ((2M CACHE 200x8 SingelCore) Colorful NFORCE680I SLI motherboard heatsink Tunq Tower120 memory GSKILL F2-8500CL5D-2GBHK Graphics NVIDIA GEFORCE 8600GT
ATI RADEON HD2600XT
many readers who email me I do not know 3D graphics and video acceleration core, the core of what is directly related to the core do not know the frequency of video acceleration is not moving to follow the core frequency. This is different because the core frequency of different makes video acceleration. To this end I purposely made a test, please enjoy.

floating core frequency HD2600XT video acceleration for very little ability to influence, values very close to, can be viewed as non- effect. And then some impact on the GF8600, but it can be seen and not directly proportional to frequency, so it can be seen and the core is independent of frequency.
other words, you either buy a high-frequency version of the 8600GTS,cheap barcelona jersey, or a low-frequency version The 8600GT,barcelona jersey, for the purposes of watching the video, there is no impact. HD2600XT is also the same reason, derived from here, and the 3D performance of the core frequency is only relevant, irrelevant, and video acceleration.
video acceleration technology in next-generation graphics card help different sources on-chip CPU requirements
CPUINTEL Core 2 Duo E6300 ((2M CACHE 200x8 SingelCore) Colorful NFORCE680I SLI motherboard heatsink Tunq Tower120 memory GSKILL F2-8500CL5D-2GBHK Graphics NVIDIA GEFORCE 8600GT
ATI RADEON HD2600XT though With good graphics, but we also want to know the different sources for the load on the CPU, touch takes less CPU can use other programs to use multiple processes, the two do not delay.

GF8600 acceleration for H.264, it is quite good, but unfortunately in dealing with VC-1 a little bit of feeling powerless. By comparison, the HD2600 which is very good, all the applications did not exceed the maximum 50% CPU utilization, and this is just a 1.6G single core CPU.
AMD / INTEL CPU up to 11 models of pure soft decompression test-H.264
CPU

NTEL Core 2 Duo E6850 (4M CACHE 333x9 DualCore )
INTEL Core 2 Duo E6750 (4M CACHE 333x8 DualCore)
INTEL Core 2 Duo E6300 (2M CACHE 266x7 DualCore)
INTEL Pentium E2160 (1M CACHE 200x9 DualCore)
INTEL PentiumD 915 (2Mx2 CACHE 200x14 DualCore)
INTEL Celeron 430 (512KB CACHE 200x9 SingelCore)
AMD ATHLON64 FX62 (1Mx2 CACHE 200x14 DualCore)
AMD ATHLON64x2 3600 + (512KBx2 CACHE 200x9.5 DualCore)
AMD ATHLON64 FX57 (1M CACHE 200x14 SingelCore)
AMD ATHLON64 4000 + (1M CACHE 200x12 SingelCore)
AMD ATHLON64 3000 + (512KB CACHE 200x9 SingelCore)
NFORCE680I SLI motherboard
Colorful Colorful C.N7050-PV
Colorful TA-690G AM2
radiator Tunq Tower120 memory GSKILL F2-8500CL5D-2GBHK Graphics NVIDIA GEFORCE 8500GT (not open hardware solution)

INTEL E6750 and the AMD ATHLON64 FX62 performance capabilities rather, are for Soft power is very strong solution CPU. AMD / INTEL CPU up to 11 models of pure soft decompression test-VC-1
CPU NTEL Core 2 Duo E6850 (4M CACHE 333x9 DualCore)
INTEL Core 2 Duo E6750 ( 4M CACHE 333x8 DualCore)
INTEL Core 2 Duo E6300 (2M CACHE 266x7 DualCore)
INTEL Pentium E2160 (1M CACHE 200x9 DualCore)
INTEL PentiumD 915 (2Mx2 CACHE 200x14 DualCore)
INTEL Celeron 430 ( 512KB CACHE 200x9 SingelCore)
AMD ATHLON64 FX62 (1Mx2 CACHE 200x14 DualCore)
AMD ATHLON64x2 3600 + (512KBx2 CACHE 200x9.5 DualCore)
AMD ATHLON64 FX57 (1M CACHE 200x14 SingelCore)
AMD ATHLON64 4000 + (1M CACHE 200x12 SingelCore)
AMD ATHLON64 3000 + (512KB CACHE 200x9 SingelCore)
NFORCE680I SLI motherboard
Colorful Colorful C.N7050-PV
Colorful TA-690G AM2
Radiator Tunq Tower120 memory GSKILL F2-8500CL5D-2GBHK Graphics NVIDIA GEFORCE 8500GT (not open hardware solution)
AMD / INTEL CPU up to 11 models of pure soft decompression test-MPEG2
CPU NTEL Core 2 Duo E6850 ( 4M CACHE 333x9 DualCore)
INTEL Core 2 Duo E6750 (4M CACHE 333x8 DualCore)
INTEL Core 2 Duo E6300 (2M CACHE 266x7 DualCore)
INTEL Pentium E2160 (1M CACHE 200x9 DualCore)
INTEL PentiumD 915 (2Mx2 CACHE 200x14 DualCore)
INTEL Celeron 430 (512KB CACHE 200x9 SingelCore)
AMD ATHLON64 FX62 (1Mx2 CACHE 200x14 DualCore)
AMD ATHLON64x2 3600 + (512KBx2 CACHE 200x9.5 DualCore)
AMD ATHLON64 FX57 (1M CACHE 200x14 SingelCore)
AMD ATHLON64 4000 + (1M CACHE 200x12 SingelCore)
AMD ATHLON64 3000 + (512KB CACHE 200x9 SingelCore)
board Colorful Colorful C.N7050 NFORCE680I SLI
-PV
Colorful TA-690G AM2
radiator Tunq Tower120 memory GSKILL F2-8500CL5D-2GBHK Graphics NVIDIA GEFORCE 8500GT (not open hardware solution)

ATI / NVIDIA graphics cards up to 12 Hardware decoding test-H.264

CPUINTEL Core 2 Duo E6300 ((2M CACHE 200x8 SingelCore) Colorful NFORCE680I SLI motherboard heatsink Tunq Tower120 memory GSKILL F2-8500CL5D-2GBHK NVIDIA GEFORCE 6600GT
NVIDIA graphics cards GEFORCE 7600GS
NVIDIA GEFORCE 7600GT
NVIDIA GEFORCE 8500GT
NVIDIA GEFORCE 8600GTS
NVIDIA GEFORCE 8800GTS
ATI RADEON X1300PRO
ATI RADEON X1650PRO
ATI RADEON X1950GT
ATI RADEON HD2400XT
ATI RADEON HD2600XT
ATI RADEON HD2900XT
TT ToughPower 650W Power Supply Seagate 7200 10 250G (8M) SATA3G

we see a new generation of HD2600/2400XT and GF8600/8500 were very much Well, while the other hand, high-end 2900XT/8800GTS since there is no centralized PUREVIDEO HD and AVIVO HD, so the CPU utilization and the performance of previous generation almost. the last generation of GF7 words X1000, GF7 slightly small victory. ATI / NVIDIA up to 12 extract the test section of the graphics hardware-VC-1
CPUINTEL Core 2 Duo E6300 ((2M CACHE 200x8 SingelCore) Colorful NFORCE680I SLI motherboard heatsink Tunq Tower120 memory GSKILL F2-8500CL5D-2GBHK NVIDIA GEFORCE 6600GT
NVIDIA graphics cards GEFORCE 7600GS
NVIDIA GEFORCE 7600GT
NVIDIA GEFORCE 8500GT
NVIDIA GEFORCE 8600GTS
NVIDIA GEFORCE 8800GTS
ATI RADEON X1300PRO
ATI RADEON X1650PRO
ATI RADEON X1950GT
ATI RADEON HD2400XT
ATI RADEON HD2600XT
ATI RADEON HD2900XT
TT ToughPower 650W Power Supply Seagate 7200 10 250G (8M) SATA3G

to the VC-1 that there are many strange things, first of all, and HD2900XT X1000 AVIVO does not work after the opening series of acceleration, should be the Frequency Transform decoded by the GPU, while the other three steps are still to the CPU decoder, which should be driver issues. So all the shit bottom can only be NVIDIA. And on the other hand, HD2400/2600 terrible ability to decode VC-1 is manifested, far better than all the graphics, amazing.
ATI / NVIDIA graphics cards up to 12 hard-decompression test-MPEG2
CPUINTEL Core 2 Duo E6300 ( (2M CACHE 200x8 SingelCore) Colorful NFORCE680I SLI motherboard heatsink Tunq Tower120 memory GSKILL F2-8500CL5D-2GBHK Graphics NVIDIA GEFORCE 6600GT
NVIDIA GEFORCE 7600GS
NVIDIA GEFORCE 7600GT
NVIDIA GEFORCE 8500GT
NVIDIA GEFORCE 8600GTS
NVIDIA GEFORCE 8800GTS
ATI RADEON X1300PRO
ATI RADEON X1650PRO
ATI RADEON X1950GT
ATI RADEON HD2400XT
ATI RADEON HD2600XT
ATI RADEON HD2900XT
hard TT ToughPower 650W Power Supply Seagate 7200 10 250G (8M) SATA3G

can say that all of the graphics are very close, only the most old GF6600 CPU occupancy rate of some high, but it does not matter, not the highest for all graphics to 50% for both the same. are there differences in how the soft decoding?
CPUAMD ATHLON64x2 3800 + (512KBx2 CACHE 200x9 DualCore) Colorful TA-690G AM2 motherboard heatsink Tunq Tower120 memory GSKILL F2-8500CL5D-2GBHK Graphics NVIDIA GEFORCE 8500GT (not open hardware decoding)
ATI RADEON X1300PRO (do not open the hardware decoding)
ATI RADEON HD2600XT (do not open the hardware decoding)
TT ToughPower 650W Power Supply Seagate 7200 10 250G (8M) SATA3G this test is in the testing process found, when we head back to check discovered the problem, and the author a right to see what the problem is.
This is 3800 + 8500 soft decompression with VC-1 cut-off of the map when King Kong, because at that time did not Note that does not cut the whole figure.
and we also do not change with the 2600XT hardware decoding of the case open, CPU usage significantly decreased. from an average of 53% to 39%.
disable ATI AVIVO we see the tool is PowerDVD, presumably the same as the soft decompression should be the same CPU, ah, how is this going on here.
PowerDVD in the original VC-1 which can only be controlled Pixel Prediction (pixels forecast) and Deblocking (ring solution block filtering) of the switch, and can not directly control the Frequency Transform (frequency conversion) of the switch,lebron james jerseys, so the default in the driver support is open. as a blueprint as shown.

PowerDVD switch does not fully support all steps.
summary
overtime because the company has 1 point to the fast, there is still a lot of things not done, had also concluded that many, but now is not being said, the latter supplemented with:
need Note that the test results, not my focus, I think the significance of this article is to let more people know about high definition, so that this is not an evaluation, the trial is just a rookie Notes (only recently started trying very hard to learn this.)
This test is very complicated, there really want to thank Xiegao Lei and large to help people, especially the large people also work together with me to the middle of the night.
technical guidance, I suddenly hit me at the time of writing a teammate VIVIALINUX, h.264 decoding CPU out of the cattle, I corrected a lot of terms and concepts. are here together to say thank you.
HD Finally I wish you happy!!!

08-16-2011, 01:34 AM	#2
hgfbgffx Posts: n/a	What is the best food sources for coding CPU CPUINTEL Core 2 Duo E6850 (3G L2 CAHCE 4M) Colorful NFORCE680I SLI motherboard heatsink Tunq Tower120 memory GSKILL F2-8500CL5D-2GBHK NVIDIA GEFORCE 8500GT graphics card in order to discuss this test we , the various sources for (different codes) in the same platform, namely what kind of system load, and let us know the code differences between the soft solution. Babel is very, very loss of resources, you can see in the Core 2 duo E6850 Fengyun the most powerful CPU, the peak in the soft solution reached 82%, while the average occupancy is also 72%. While the general did not look at films, few will be multi-task, but hung up subtitles, then open BT and other background process,kobe bryant jerseys, making life difficult to ensure that E6850 can completely smooth playback Moreover, it is most powerful Core 2 Duo, so we come to a conclusion, Babel source of this film is not suitable for soft real solution. Although the average of 007 ############ Royale, Flags of Our Fathers slightly lower than some, but the maximum occupancy rate is the most determined whether the card, coupled with the lowest occupancy is still higher than the one in ############ Royale, so we ############ Royale to determine the hardware requirements for a chip far better than Flags of Our Fathers. The Flags of Our Fathers Pirates of the Caribbean and are inextricably, if integrated H.264 is still in the Pirates of the Caribbean is one of the lowest occupancy rate. In fact, both the Royal 007, or Flags of Our Fathers, or the Pirates of the Caribbean, represent the latest 1080p H.264 high rate of CPU utilization, overall the side although there is no Babel metamorphosis, but also than the VC-1 come together above. And we see from the table, H.264 inter BABEL outside the other three sources in an average CPU utilization is not high on the VC-1 too much, just at the highest CPU usage will suddenly soaring, see the CPU occupancy H.264 curve can also be seen to this point,derrick rose jerseys, often winding paths of the. VC-1 of the CPU occupancy rate change is small, only 20% of the maximum is also more compared to H.264 is much to be smooth, so long as the VC-1 has become so basic flow, it will not appear Card state. MPEG-2 is really not to mention the CPU occupancy, and now the CPU occupancy QQ almost taller than him, no wonder there are old friends will VC-1/H.264 machine convert MPEG2 to make a. Summary: CPU occupancy rate, Babel> 007 ############ Royale> Flags of Our Fathers> Pirates of the Caribbean> Diamond> Dreamgirls> Band of Brothers, H.264> VC-1> MPEG4 your the CPU, to meet the H264/VC-1/MPEG2 sources for soft solution to ask for? CPU INTEL Core 2 Duo E6850 (4M CACHE 333x9 DualCore) INTEL Core 2 Duo E6750 (4M CACHE 333x8 DualCore) INTEL Core 2 Duo E6300 (2M CACHE 266x7 DualCore) INTEL Pentium E2160 (1M CACHE 200x9 DualCore) INTEL PentiumD 915 (2Mx2 CACHE 200x14 DualCore) INTEL Celeron M430 (512KB CACHE 200x9 SingelCore) AMD ATHLON64 FX62 (1Mx2 CACHE 200x14 DualCore) AMD ATHLON64x2 3600 + (512KBx2 CACHE 200x9.5 DualCore) AMD ATHLON64 FX57 (1M CACHE 200x14 SingelCore) AMD ATHLON64 4000 + (1M CACHE 200x12 SingelCore) AMD ATHLON64 3000 + (512KB CACHE 200x9 SingelCore) Colorful NFORCE680I SLI board Colorful C.N7050-PV Colorful TA-690G AM2 radiator Tunq Tower120 memory GSKILL F2-8500CL5D-2GBHK Graphics NVIDIA GEFORCE 8500GT (not open without hardware ) The purpose of this test is to let everyone understand the different codes of the required minimum CPU frequency / type,cheap minesota twins jerseys, or find a property for their own CPU close to the condemnation, see the extract can not be smooth. First of all, we want to define the concept of a smooth, and smooth it is different from most of the time not only smooth but also not card. This will make two of the CPU usage requirements: 1: CPU average occupancy rate of not more than 80%, after more than 80% if there is another daemon running may lose the smooth feeling. 2: CPU can not exceed the maximum occupancy rate of 90%, even if you average occupancy rate of less than 50%, but 90% of cards at once may cause the screen shows card or Washington state. so our test is carried out based on the above conditions. First, start with the MPEG2 start, all the above through the MPEG2 CPU test, even the weakest ATHLON 64 3000 + are completely fine. VC-1, we have from the King to represent the highest level, we use a single core FX62 overclocked to 3G testing since our previous FX57 can not pass this test, the highest occupancy rate of 94% CPU, fine end. In it we see a single core to levy the highest test frequency is only through it, to less than 1% CPU utilization called walking a fine line, this also means that not all single-core CPU overclocking will not be too measurement. Follow-up test PD915 is also possible to pass the test, but also just pass it. H.264, we use to test the highest level of Babel. I tried to 3.4G over the Celeron M430 software solutions can not solve the problem, it seems that non-dual-core is not. The dual-core must also be competent leader, we see that E6750 to E6550 in the down-is still not running smoothly after the maximum has exceeded 93.75%, can only say that can not be qualified. Babel needs more CPU e6750 can be truly considered smooth. Now we all pass the test of the CPU listed, so you need to understand all the sources for what kind of CPU. Encoding test (ie the highest occupied less than 90% CPU, an average of 80% or less) CPUMPEG2INTEL Core 2 Duo E6850 INTEL Core 2 Duo E6750 INTEL Core 2 Duo E6300 INTEL Pentium E2160 INTEL Pentium D 915 INTEL Celeron M430 AMD ATHLON64 FX62 AMD ATHLON64x2 3600 + AMD ATHLON64 FX57 AMD ATHLON64 4000 + AMD ATHLON64 3000 + VC-1INTEL Core 2 Duo E6850 INTEL Core 2 Duo E6750 INTEL Core 2 Duo E6300 INTEL Pentium E2160 INTEL Pentium D 915 AMD ATHLON64 FX62 AMD ATHLON64x2 3600 + H.264INTEL Core 2 Duo E6850 INTEL Core 2 Duo E6750 AMD ATHLON64 FX62 video acceleration graphics core frequency has no use? Need to look at the video card does not need to buy high? CPUINTEL Core 2 Duo E6300 ((2M CACHE 200x8 SingelCore) Colorful NFORCE680I SLI motherboard heatsink Tunq Tower120 memory GSKILL F2-8500CL5D-2GBHK Graphics NVIDIA GEFORCE 8600GT ATI RADEON HD2600XT many readers who email me I do not know 3D graphics and video acceleration core, the core of what is directly related to the core do not know the frequency of video acceleration is not moving to follow the core frequency. This is different because the core frequency of different makes video acceleration. To this end I purposely made a test, please enjoy. floating core frequency HD2600XT video acceleration for very little ability to influence, values very close to, can be viewed as non- effect. And then some impact on the GF8600, but it can be seen and not directly proportional to frequency, so it can be seen and the core is independent of frequency. other words, you either buy a high-frequency version of the 8600GTS,cheap barcelona jersey, or a low-frequency version The 8600GT,barcelona jersey, for the purposes of watching the video, there is no impact. HD2600XT is also the same reason, derived from here, and the 3D performance of the core frequency is only relevant, irrelevant, and video acceleration. video acceleration technology in next-generation graphics card help different sources on-chip CPU requirements CPUINTEL Core 2 Duo E6300 ((2M CACHE 200x8 SingelCore) Colorful NFORCE680I SLI motherboard heatsink Tunq Tower120 memory GSKILL F2-8500CL5D-2GBHK Graphics NVIDIA GEFORCE 8600GT ATI RADEON HD2600XT though With good graphics, but we also want to know the different sources for the load on the CPU, touch takes less CPU can use other programs to use multiple processes, the two do not delay. GF8600 acceleration for H.264, it is quite good, but unfortunately in dealing with VC-1 a little bit of feeling powerless. By comparison, the HD2600 which is very good, all the applications did not exceed the maximum 50% CPU utilization, and this is just a 1.6G single core CPU. AMD / INTEL CPU up to 11 models of pure soft decompression test-H.264 CPU NTEL Core 2 Duo E6850 (4M CACHE 333x9 DualCore ) INTEL Core 2 Duo E6750 (4M CACHE 333x8 DualCore) INTEL Core 2 Duo E6300 (2M CACHE 266x7 DualCore) INTEL Pentium E2160 (1M CACHE 200x9 DualCore) INTEL PentiumD 915 (2Mx2 CACHE 200x14 DualCore) INTEL Celeron 430 (512KB CACHE 200x9 SingelCore) AMD ATHLON64 FX62 (1Mx2 CACHE 200x14 DualCore) AMD ATHLON64x2 3600 + (512KBx2 CACHE 200x9.5 DualCore) AMD ATHLON64 FX57 (1M CACHE 200x14 SingelCore) AMD ATHLON64 4000 + (1M CACHE 200x12 SingelCore) AMD ATHLON64 3000 + (512KB CACHE 200x9 SingelCore) NFORCE680I SLI motherboard Colorful Colorful C.N7050-PV Colorful TA-690G AM2 radiator Tunq Tower120 memory GSKILL F2-8500CL5D-2GBHK Graphics NVIDIA GEFORCE 8500GT (not open hardware solution) INTEL E6750 and the AMD ATHLON64 FX62 performance capabilities rather, are for Soft power is very strong solution CPU. AMD / INTEL CPU up to 11 models of pure soft decompression test-VC-1 CPU NTEL Core 2 Duo E6850 (4M CACHE 333x9 DualCore) INTEL Core 2 Duo E6750 ( 4M CACHE 333x8 DualCore) INTEL Core 2 Duo E6300 (2M CACHE 266x7 DualCore) INTEL Pentium E2160 (1M CACHE 200x9 DualCore) INTEL PentiumD 915 (2Mx2 CACHE 200x14 DualCore) INTEL Celeron 430 ( 512KB CACHE 200x9 SingelCore) AMD ATHLON64 FX62 (1Mx2 CACHE 200x14 DualCore) AMD ATHLON64x2 3600 + (512KBx2 CACHE 200x9.5 DualCore) AMD ATHLON64 FX57 (1M CACHE 200x14 SingelCore) AMD ATHLON64 4000 + (1M CACHE 200x12 SingelCore) AMD ATHLON64 3000 + (512KB CACHE 200x9 SingelCore) NFORCE680I SLI motherboard Colorful Colorful C.N7050-PV Colorful TA-690G AM2 Radiator Tunq Tower120 memory GSKILL F2-8500CL5D-2GBHK Graphics NVIDIA GEFORCE 8500GT (not open hardware solution) AMD / INTEL CPU up to 11 models of pure soft decompression test-MPEG2 CPU NTEL Core 2 Duo E6850 ( 4M CACHE 333x9 DualCore) INTEL Core 2 Duo E6750 (4M CACHE 333x8 DualCore) INTEL Core 2 Duo E6300 (2M CACHE 266x7 DualCore) INTEL Pentium E2160 (1M CACHE 200x9 DualCore) INTEL PentiumD 915 (2Mx2 CACHE 200x14 DualCore) INTEL Celeron 430 (512KB CACHE 200x9 SingelCore) AMD ATHLON64 FX62 (1Mx2 CACHE 200x14 DualCore) AMD ATHLON64x2 3600 + (512KBx2 CACHE 200x9.5 DualCore) AMD ATHLON64 FX57 (1M CACHE 200x14 SingelCore) AMD ATHLON64 4000 + (1M CACHE 200x12 SingelCore) AMD ATHLON64 3000 + (512KB CACHE 200x9 SingelCore) board Colorful Colorful C.N7050 NFORCE680I SLI -PV Colorful TA-690G AM2 radiator Tunq Tower120 memory GSKILL F2-8500CL5D-2GBHK Graphics NVIDIA GEFORCE 8500GT (not open hardware solution) ATI / NVIDIA graphics cards up to 12 Hardware decoding test-H.264 CPUINTEL Core 2 Duo E6300 ((2M CACHE 200x8 SingelCore) Colorful NFORCE680I SLI motherboard heatsink Tunq Tower120 memory GSKILL F2-8500CL5D-2GBHK NVIDIA GEFORCE 6600GT NVIDIA graphics cards GEFORCE 7600GS NVIDIA GEFORCE 7600GT NVIDIA GEFORCE 8500GT NVIDIA GEFORCE 8600GTS NVIDIA GEFORCE 8800GTS ATI RADEON X1300PRO ATI RADEON X1650PRO ATI RADEON X1950GT ATI RADEON HD2400XT ATI RADEON HD2600XT ATI RADEON HD2900XT TT ToughPower 650W Power Supply Seagate 7200 10 250G (8M) SATA3G we see a new generation of HD2600/2400XT and GF8600/8500 were very much Well, while the other hand, high-end 2900XT/8800GTS since there is no centralized PUREVIDEO HD and AVIVO HD, so the CPU utilization and the performance of previous generation almost. the last generation of GF7 words X1000, GF7 slightly small victory. ATI / NVIDIA up to 12 extract the test section of the graphics hardware-VC-1 CPUINTEL Core 2 Duo E6300 ((2M CACHE 200x8 SingelCore) Colorful NFORCE680I SLI motherboard heatsink Tunq Tower120 memory GSKILL F2-8500CL5D-2GBHK NVIDIA GEFORCE 6600GT NVIDIA graphics cards GEFORCE 7600GS NVIDIA GEFORCE 7600GT NVIDIA GEFORCE 8500GT NVIDIA GEFORCE 8600GTS NVIDIA GEFORCE 8800GTS ATI RADEON X1300PRO ATI RADEON X1650PRO ATI RADEON X1950GT ATI RADEON HD2400XT ATI RADEON HD2600XT ATI RADEON HD2900XT TT ToughPower 650W Power Supply Seagate 7200 10 250G (8M) SATA3G to the VC-1 that there are many strange things, first of all, and HD2900XT X1000 AVIVO does not work after the opening series of acceleration, should be the Frequency Transform decoded by the GPU, while the other three steps are still to the CPU decoder, which should be driver issues. So all the shit bottom can only be NVIDIA. And on the other hand, HD2400/2600 terrible ability to decode VC-1 is manifested, far better than all the graphics, amazing. ATI / NVIDIA graphics cards up to 12 hard-decompression test-MPEG2 CPUINTEL Core 2 Duo E6300 ( (2M CACHE 200x8 SingelCore) Colorful NFORCE680I SLI motherboard heatsink Tunq Tower120 memory GSKILL F2-8500CL5D-2GBHK Graphics NVIDIA GEFORCE 6600GT NVIDIA GEFORCE 7600GS NVIDIA GEFORCE 7600GT NVIDIA GEFORCE 8500GT NVIDIA GEFORCE 8600GTS NVIDIA GEFORCE 8800GTS ATI RADEON X1300PRO ATI RADEON X1650PRO ATI RADEON X1950GT ATI RADEON HD2400XT ATI RADEON HD2600XT ATI RADEON HD2900XT hard TT ToughPower 650W Power Supply Seagate 7200 10 250G (8M) SATA3G can say that all of the graphics are very close, only the most old GF6600 CPU occupancy rate of some high, but it does not matter, not the highest for all graphics to 50% for both the same. are there differences in how the soft decoding? CPUAMD ATHLON64x2 3800 + (512KBx2 CACHE 200x9 DualCore) Colorful TA-690G AM2 motherboard heatsink Tunq Tower120 memory GSKILL F2-8500CL5D-2GBHK Graphics NVIDIA GEFORCE 8500GT (not open hardware decoding) ATI RADEON X1300PRO (do not open the hardware decoding) ATI RADEON HD2600XT (do not open the hardware decoding) TT ToughPower 650W Power Supply Seagate 7200 10 250G (8M) SATA3G this test is in the testing process found, when we head back to check discovered the problem, and the author a right to see what the problem is. This is 3800 + 8500 soft decompression with VC-1 cut-off of the map when King Kong, because at that time did not Note that does not cut the whole figure. and we also do not change with the 2600XT hardware decoding of the case open, CPU usage significantly decreased. from an average of 53% to 39%. disable ATI AVIVO we see the tool is PowerDVD, presumably the same as the soft decompression should be the same CPU, ah, how is this going on here. PowerDVD in the original VC-1 which can only be controlled Pixel Prediction (pixels forecast) and Deblocking (ring solution block filtering) of the switch, and can not directly control the Frequency Transform (frequency conversion) of the switch,lebron james jerseys, so the default in the driver support is open. as a blueprint as shown. PowerDVD switch does not fully support all steps. summary overtime because the company has 1 point to the fast, there is still a lot of things not done, had also concluded that many, but now is not being said, the latter supplemented with: need Note that the test results, not my focus, I think the significance of this article is to let more people know about high definition, so that this is not an evaluation, the trial is just a rookie Notes (only recently started trying very hard to learn this.) This test is very complicated, there really want to thank Xiegao Lei and large to help people, especially the large people also work together with me to the middle of the night. technical guidance, I suddenly hit me at the time of writing a teammate VIVIALINUX, h.264 decoding CPU out of the cattle, I corrected a lot of terms and concepts. are here together to say thank you. HD Finally I wish you happy!!!

Sponsored Links