View Single Post
Old 08-15-2011, 03:05 PM   #2
Brooke284
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Over the final couple of months there have been a digit of shocking magazine covers, both for nice causes and bad. Here Models Direct reviews these startling recent covers.Firstly, the bad. A current favourite fashion icon, Michelle Obama, features on the 125th edition of Good Housekeeping. This would normally be great, but unfortunately someone has gone a bit overboard with their Photoshop capabilities. This results in a rather plastic, almost calculator character-like, picture of the beautiful premier matron.
At the other end of the scale we have the French, Australian and US Marie Claire magazines production a statement along attempting more normal pictures in ‘non-airbrushed' editions. While this seems like a magnificent push in the vogue and modelling manufacture, for well as something because ‘mere mortal' women, the photo shoots have been met with some negate answers, mostly caring Jessica Simpson in US Marie Claire.The journal claims namely Simpson is no dressing component and hasn't been airbrushed for her cover shoot and inside pages, merely some human remain sceptical. "No makeup? No retouch? Thanks for insulting either my eyesight and intelligence," angrily states 1 reader of a news treatise almost the photo shoot. On the inverse side of the contention, different remark reads "A tiny eyelash curling and a little impudence pinching may have given her a look that seems as though she's wearing makeup. So, I definitely purchase the "au naturel" see. I know many girls that don't need concealer alternatively chapstick, so why not Simpson?" Whether the images were edited alternatively not, Models Direct thinks she looks excellent in the photos and like the natural feel the magazine has gone for.On the cover of French Marie Claire's anti-airbrushing version is French actress Louise Bougoin, meantime Miss Universe 2004 medalist and model Jennifer Hawkins who posed nude and un-airbrushed for Australian Marie Claire.The latter occasioned a negative reaction while human questioned why it wasn't ‘real' women creature functioned, preferably than the almost flawless Hawkins. General Manager of dining muddle generosity the Butterfly Foundation,Christian Louboutin Esoteri 120 ankle boots bi-colored leather, Julie Parker, made her comments about the cover picture and airbrushing."It's so extravagant in magazines these days and youth girls and women are often narrating us that they don't even know what they're looking by any more, and what they ambition apt penetrate is more real, unused and natural photos of celebrities and people in magazines, and I calculate this delivers that.""The object is unfortunately it doesn't make the same point, for Jennifer sells magazines and she creates awareness," Ms Parker said when inquired why daily women weren't secondhand. "If Marie Claire had chosen to put ashore their cover one ordinary female, mention myself or a friend of yours, it would not have built the awareness it does."Of lesson Ms Parker has a point; it fair seems that there will forever be a separate in this discussion. Either path,Herve leger low-cut dress, Models Direct love seeing both celebrities and pretty real women creature characterized naturally in magazines and wishes that it's a trend that continues.
  Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links