Zhong Guangwang Beijing August 31, according to Voice of China comprehensiveness, 89 million of compensation is reasonable, the voice of the connection experts in criminal law, China University of Political Science Professor Hongdao De:
Moderator: Professor Hung, we note signed by Prince made the compensation Party signed an agreement subject is Donglan People's Government, from a legal point of view, the Government as the principal to sign the compensation agreement signed legal?
should just say so in full compliance with the law, the State Compensation Law of China clearly stipulates that organ for compensatory obligations should be justice organizations, like the present case is concerned, has been the people's court conviction and sentence, and the ultimate obligation of reparation authority should be the people's court.
Moderator: We see the agreement, the compensation is composed of two parts, respectively, soothing the spirit of the national compensation and benefits poor, these two are comprehensive, the prince is also made to apply compensation or other claim other rights?
from the State Compensation Law, there are other terms, such as his medical bills, if other members of his family need him to support and maintenance costs of the people, and if he lost his ability to work from such as the detention caused his disability, his personal life and other living expenses,
tod's outlet, which under the state compensation law,
Tod's Men's Shoes, should be borne by the state in this agreement is not specifically listed among the several parts that should be said that in the future if are involved in this area if needed, or you can continue to apply for state compensation.
Moderator: We note also agreed in the Agreement, the Prince of compensation made at this time, after the case themselves and their families can not be any reason for the government and the judiciary at all levels of compensation and any other requirements, the agreement is reasonable, or that there is no legal basis?
this convention is not to actually treat it as a state compensation, which is actually between the local government and the Prince made a deal with civil, and the claims for compensation from the distant country, compensation or not the state can exist in this area as a provision.
from their consensual if a portion of their right to the point of view, this provision may be; but from this point of view on State Compensation, in fact,
tods shoes, this provision does not exist, as does not exist, given the This is of little practical significance.