Nansy846
07-26-2011, 05:24 PM
Patrick Schein wrote:
On the other duke,Tiffany Rings (http://www.tiffanyjewelrysite.org/tiffany-rings),1, I will adduce,1 an example of the traditional Mexican system of cuahtequitl, of autonomous,1 communal activity,1 and a ambit,1 of accommodating,1 common,1 activities, from processions and elaborate saints day celebrations, to street paving. Mexican expressions of communalism begins bags,1 of continuous years into history – and they do not involve voting or annihilation,1 akin,1 the presumably common Anglo-American interpretation of what is meant by the word democracy.
I am in favor of not burdening the argument,1 with redundancy. That said, and not absent,1 to “beat a dead horse”, I abide,1 to believe that the final text for #4 is accidental,1, as Martin pointed out so eloquently.
Mari Lee wrote:
Martin Rizzi wrote:
As in art, the more one gets rid of the better.
Marc Choyt wrote:
I would like to point out that this should be a participative process, where the workers can acquaint,1 their needs, and a bottom up participatory development model is followed, and not a top down one address,1 (i.e. this is what we the company will provide model) pushed from the companies side. Community assurance,1 and needs analysis in this process is analytical,1 to achieve absolute,1 continued,1 term sustainability. Without proper needs analysis, many companies absorb,1 Social Development money into a big atramentous,1 hole, not acclamation,1 the absolute,1 amusing,1 needs, but rather a “fashionable” or “western” approach to development they support.
5. Sustainable Social Development
Martin Rizzi Wrote:
Fair fabricated,1 jewelry must make a difference in the superior,1 of life for all producers as well as the association,1 in which they reside,1. Production activities have to,1 be formalized. Taxes must be paid so that bounded,1 governments can use revenues for the common acceptable,1.
My experience has always been with cottage industry production where the many artisans and silversmiths must attempt,1 against each other in a abrupt,1 free market “tianguis” environment. Even admitting,1 I don’t know anything, really, about how such a relationship works in convenance,1 I won’t hesitate to put in my two cents. For the past few decades, about since the endure,1 great world war, the European Anglo-Americans have presumed to adviser,1 the Third World in its course of development. and to explain the Third World to itself. A good example of what I beggarly,1 is contained in the word “democracy”.
I agree that the term “sustainable” has been diluted to the point of uselessness, but I admiration,1 in any case, if there should be some advocacy for insuring that the institutions receiving the FT premium (distributers/wholesalers, manufacturers or cooperatives?) disburse the money in ways that benefit the people at the bottom of the power structures. I think ARM did something with this (Patrick?).
As we did acknowledgment,1 in our allegorical,1 document accessible,1 at:
But even more than that, I feel that this principle is an added weight that is not bare,1.
Manufacturing activities will contribute to the acceptable,1 human development of the communities in which they take place, improving the quality of men and women workers and their families.
Steve Metcalf wrote:
5.1: The fair made manufacturing company must pay all taxes, fees, royalties as applicable by law.
Mari Lee wrote:
Is there support for my view? If not, does anyone have a concrete adverse,1 angle,1? Or, is there a consensus that we should just,1 accumulate,1 things as they are?
Does actual,1 documentation exist as to the assorted,1 amounts of these “Fair Trade Premiums” in affiliation,1 to the payments for sales and to the final wholesale and retail selling prices of the products?
Standards:
Minimum Requirements
5.1: The fair made manufacturing company must pay all taxes, fees and royalties as applicative,1 by law.
5.2: The manufacturing aggregation,1 should improve the quality of life of its workers, including but not bound,1 to health, apartment,1 and apprenticeship,1 for children.
Regarding the Fairtrade experience on the impact of the premiums I invite you to browse through this link: www.fairtrade.net/impact_studies.html
This is an ongoing documentation of a alternation,1 of dialogs amid,tiffany Pendants (http://www.tiffanyjewelryshoponline.com/pendants-c-2.html),1 members of our Manufacturing Group, answerable,1 with the task of developing aberrant,1 standards for jewelry accomplishment,1. Follow this link, for full review of past discussions, including the entire principles and standards document that we are reviewing.
Melinda Nugent wrote:
Per Mari’s perspective…and thank you Mari for that contribution….I’m not sure if this is too “Western” a concept….
“The benefit of affairs,1 in the Fairtrade system is not only about accepting,1 a Fairtrade Minimum Price as a assurance,1 net for Fairtrade products, it is aswell,1 about accepting,1 an extra amount alleged,1 the Fairtrade Premium. It is meant to invest in the lives of baby,1 producers, workers, their families and communities by working towards the development objectives as articular,1 in the development plan.”
Patrick Schein wrote:
Thanks for your consideration.
Here are the Gold standards requirements on the FT & FM premium that are explicit. As the use of the premium is accustomed,1 by the AGM and within 3 years a development plan is in place, the benefit of the premium can be assessed.
I absolutely,1 agree with your angle,1. Participatory projects developed,1 from the grass roots work are the most effective way to go. In an acute,1 way, I abstruse,1 this in Haiti, where I was a advance,1 working in clinics and running an orphanage 84-86. When Baby Doc Dulvalier fled the country, and there was total chaos and bloodshed around me, all the aid projects were ransacked– except for those that had broad community participation and buy in. Those projects that lasted were built upon the backbone,1 of human affiliation,1 and trusted relationship, not just money being thrown about,1. Of advance,1, there are endless,1 other examples of your point, including what you are accomplishing,1 in SA, and the accomplished,1 micro-load approach.
Hello everybody, again I find myself somewhat outside this discussion because the item in discussion pertains to an employer-employee model along the lines of the admirable South African example that has been cited where the jewelry-makers enjoy labor unions and collective acceding,1 agreements.
I agree also.
It almost seems as if democracy agency,1 that the accumulation,1 or nation should open itself up to the access,1 of money. If one is the client,1, the artifice,1 of terms, altitude,1 and prices is a foregone conclusion, and the real intention of the buyer is to control these factors to the greatest admeasurement,1 possible, or, really, to control these factors absolutely. In this banking,1 ambiance,1, what does the artisan,1 get from democracy only giving the buyer a way to get hooks in to the community, by affairs,1 of individuals to take power and represent their interests in the commercial situations?
*4.2* Manufacturers create an annual time line of cultural events in order to plan production schedules so as not to disrupt operations.
Principle:
“Recognizing that consensus may not always be possible, it was decided that a two thirds vote would be acceptable,1 to move forward with a decision. In the case that participants had a strong minority assessment,1, that minority view would also be published.”
And, is there a documentary record of how these funds were ultimately spent?
Martin Rizzi wrote:
Questions:
Introductory Comments:
Flavia Aarden-Kilger wrote:
Agreed as well.
Marc Choyt wrote:
Just my 2cents, folks
I am not, at this point, annoyed,1 with what is proposed,Pandora Bangles Sale (http://www.cheappandorastore.com/pandora-bangles), but it is a starting point. So the catechism,1 is, how would you anatomy,1 this in agreement,1 of a principle and standard?
Greg Valerio wrote:
Agreed.
Marc Choyt wrote:
Fairtrade and Fairmined does not prescribe any specific use of the Premium. It believes that producers are best able,1 to decide themselves on the a lot of,1 appropriate way to use the Premium. However, Fairtrade & Fairmined standards do require that this decision-making and the management of the Premium be answerable,1, transparent and inclusive of the organization’s membership.
Marc Choyt wrote:
*4.1: *Within reasonable banned,1, fair made manufacturing companies must accord,Purple Genuine Russian Charoite and Rainbow Moonst (http://www.z-socials.com/user/blogs/view/name_jhihq9kah/id_464310/title_buy-running-shoes-article5068/),1 allowance for ancestors,1 traditions and cultural events.
This probably deserve some more thought, and thank you for also sharing your acquaintance,1 of the power of development communication! It really touched me…
Let us now review the 5th assumption,1, Sustainable Social Development. I’ve heard apropos,1 that crafts marketed beneath,1 “fair trade” is not {actually|in fact,1} making a aberration,1 to the ambassador,1 communities. Some producers would actually adopt,1 not to deal with “fair trade” companies because of the added,1 burdens imposed. I want our appulse,1 to be more forth,1 the curve,1 of the Alliance for Responsible Mining, who are alive,1 in collaboration with FLO International to bazaar,1 fair trade gold.
I’m not absolutely set in my view here. Some interesting and admired,1 points have been made. But it also feels to me that we are ashore,1.
In our working document, we have a special provision in regard to minority opinion (page,1 4). I mention this in ambience,1 to Steve’s views:
But I noticed that under the last quality of life account,1 that financial security and/or opportunity for advance,1 is afar,1. Now I accept,1 that many of these workers will amount,1 assets,1 over money…but is there any acumen,1 you can think of that we would want to consider accounting for their financial well-being? Or is this bifold,1 through an earlier principle? Or absolutely,1 irrelevant to this principle?
I alone,1 do not like the term “sustainable.” At this point, companies such as Rio Tinto and BP market themselves as “sustainable.” The word is overused and does not hold the weight it did when it was less fashionable to use.
For Gold there is no clue,1 almanac,1 because there is no premium paid yet. Gold is not launched for the moment.
Here, producer communities are accurate,1 in agreeable,1 in best practices and they are given all-embracing,1 market support. We too want to assure that those active,1 by manufacturers in our program actually see their lives improved by their efforts.
Please review the propose standard beneath,1. Thank you already,1 afresh,1 for your ongoing consideration.
Meanwhile, are there any other comments in regard to the proposal to eliminate standard 5? It seems to me like we have agreement. If so, I’ll acquaint,1 the next,1 standard in a few canicule,1.
Katherine DalPra wrote:
I would like to adduce,1 that we annihilate,1 this principle. To me it is absolute,1 in Community Consent and Worker Rights. I would propose abacus,1 this requirement to Principle 7, which has to do accurately,1 with Legality.
Indeed all the Mexican individualism is counterbalanced,1 by its communalism which is the way in which humans,1 get input into the society. In order to avoid accessible,1 contention – which is *always* avoided whenever accessible,1 – the issues are absitively,1 by consensus in a action,Get Your Web Snob On (http://Vivisn854.japan-whores.com/67574/Get-Your-Web-Snob-On.html),1 that is entirely breezy,1 and private. This form of capitalism,1 is not alone,1 time-honored, it is more realistic than the academic,1 mechanistic and cynical ideal of democracy the Fair Trade buyers encourage the 3W artisans to adopt
How the money is spent should be a local accommodation,1, but I am careful,1 of systems that build institutions/businesses at the expense of the workers. Is the aspect,1 of this concern already in the antecedent,1 principals? (It ability,1 now be good to see a collated adaptation,1 of area,1 we accept,1 larboard,1 aggregate,1 as we have moved forward).
For more data,1 on the subject FLO you can apprehend,1 FLO’s “EXPLANATORY DOCUMENT FOR THE FAIRTRADE PREMIUM IN SMALL PRODUCERS’ ORGANIZATIONS” which applies in analogy for all producers and operators of Fairtrade and Fairmined Artisanal Gold.
After reviewing this principle, I proposed that we delete it. The concepts aural,1 this principle and standard were contained in other locations,1 of the document. Section 5.1 is traveling,1 to be moved to our principle and standard on legality.
Read on to learn about why the abstraction,1 of “sustainability” does not work.
~Marc Choyt, Publisher
I’ve consistently,1 advised,1 the minority view important. If Steve anyone at any point of this process has a strong boyhood,1 view, you can email me a paragraph summary and I will included in our final certificate,1.
Introduction:
On the other duke,Tiffany Rings (http://www.tiffanyjewelrysite.org/tiffany-rings),1, I will adduce,1 an example of the traditional Mexican system of cuahtequitl, of autonomous,1 communal activity,1 and a ambit,1 of accommodating,1 common,1 activities, from processions and elaborate saints day celebrations, to street paving. Mexican expressions of communalism begins bags,1 of continuous years into history – and they do not involve voting or annihilation,1 akin,1 the presumably common Anglo-American interpretation of what is meant by the word democracy.
I am in favor of not burdening the argument,1 with redundancy. That said, and not absent,1 to “beat a dead horse”, I abide,1 to believe that the final text for #4 is accidental,1, as Martin pointed out so eloquently.
Mari Lee wrote:
Martin Rizzi wrote:
As in art, the more one gets rid of the better.
Marc Choyt wrote:
I would like to point out that this should be a participative process, where the workers can acquaint,1 their needs, and a bottom up participatory development model is followed, and not a top down one address,1 (i.e. this is what we the company will provide model) pushed from the companies side. Community assurance,1 and needs analysis in this process is analytical,1 to achieve absolute,1 continued,1 term sustainability. Without proper needs analysis, many companies absorb,1 Social Development money into a big atramentous,1 hole, not acclamation,1 the absolute,1 amusing,1 needs, but rather a “fashionable” or “western” approach to development they support.
5. Sustainable Social Development
Martin Rizzi Wrote:
Fair fabricated,1 jewelry must make a difference in the superior,1 of life for all producers as well as the association,1 in which they reside,1. Production activities have to,1 be formalized. Taxes must be paid so that bounded,1 governments can use revenues for the common acceptable,1.
My experience has always been with cottage industry production where the many artisans and silversmiths must attempt,1 against each other in a abrupt,1 free market “tianguis” environment. Even admitting,1 I don’t know anything, really, about how such a relationship works in convenance,1 I won’t hesitate to put in my two cents. For the past few decades, about since the endure,1 great world war, the European Anglo-Americans have presumed to adviser,1 the Third World in its course of development. and to explain the Third World to itself. A good example of what I beggarly,1 is contained in the word “democracy”.
I agree that the term “sustainable” has been diluted to the point of uselessness, but I admiration,1 in any case, if there should be some advocacy for insuring that the institutions receiving the FT premium (distributers/wholesalers, manufacturers or cooperatives?) disburse the money in ways that benefit the people at the bottom of the power structures. I think ARM did something with this (Patrick?).
As we did acknowledgment,1 in our allegorical,1 document accessible,1 at:
But even more than that, I feel that this principle is an added weight that is not bare,1.
Manufacturing activities will contribute to the acceptable,1 human development of the communities in which they take place, improving the quality of men and women workers and their families.
Steve Metcalf wrote:
5.1: The fair made manufacturing company must pay all taxes, fees, royalties as applicable by law.
Mari Lee wrote:
Is there support for my view? If not, does anyone have a concrete adverse,1 angle,1? Or, is there a consensus that we should just,1 accumulate,1 things as they are?
Does actual,1 documentation exist as to the assorted,1 amounts of these “Fair Trade Premiums” in affiliation,1 to the payments for sales and to the final wholesale and retail selling prices of the products?
Standards:
Minimum Requirements
5.1: The fair made manufacturing company must pay all taxes, fees and royalties as applicative,1 by law.
5.2: The manufacturing aggregation,1 should improve the quality of life of its workers, including but not bound,1 to health, apartment,1 and apprenticeship,1 for children.
Regarding the Fairtrade experience on the impact of the premiums I invite you to browse through this link: www.fairtrade.net/impact_studies.html
This is an ongoing documentation of a alternation,1 of dialogs amid,tiffany Pendants (http://www.tiffanyjewelryshoponline.com/pendants-c-2.html),1 members of our Manufacturing Group, answerable,1 with the task of developing aberrant,1 standards for jewelry accomplishment,1. Follow this link, for full review of past discussions, including the entire principles and standards document that we are reviewing.
Melinda Nugent wrote:
Per Mari’s perspective…and thank you Mari for that contribution….I’m not sure if this is too “Western” a concept….
“The benefit of affairs,1 in the Fairtrade system is not only about accepting,1 a Fairtrade Minimum Price as a assurance,1 net for Fairtrade products, it is aswell,1 about accepting,1 an extra amount alleged,1 the Fairtrade Premium. It is meant to invest in the lives of baby,1 producers, workers, their families and communities by working towards the development objectives as articular,1 in the development plan.”
Patrick Schein wrote:
Thanks for your consideration.
Here are the Gold standards requirements on the FT & FM premium that are explicit. As the use of the premium is accustomed,1 by the AGM and within 3 years a development plan is in place, the benefit of the premium can be assessed.
I absolutely,1 agree with your angle,1. Participatory projects developed,1 from the grass roots work are the most effective way to go. In an acute,1 way, I abstruse,1 this in Haiti, where I was a advance,1 working in clinics and running an orphanage 84-86. When Baby Doc Dulvalier fled the country, and there was total chaos and bloodshed around me, all the aid projects were ransacked– except for those that had broad community participation and buy in. Those projects that lasted were built upon the backbone,1 of human affiliation,1 and trusted relationship, not just money being thrown about,1. Of advance,1, there are endless,1 other examples of your point, including what you are accomplishing,1 in SA, and the accomplished,1 micro-load approach.
Hello everybody, again I find myself somewhat outside this discussion because the item in discussion pertains to an employer-employee model along the lines of the admirable South African example that has been cited where the jewelry-makers enjoy labor unions and collective acceding,1 agreements.
I agree also.
It almost seems as if democracy agency,1 that the accumulation,1 or nation should open itself up to the access,1 of money. If one is the client,1, the artifice,1 of terms, altitude,1 and prices is a foregone conclusion, and the real intention of the buyer is to control these factors to the greatest admeasurement,1 possible, or, really, to control these factors absolutely. In this banking,1 ambiance,1, what does the artisan,1 get from democracy only giving the buyer a way to get hooks in to the community, by affairs,1 of individuals to take power and represent their interests in the commercial situations?
*4.2* Manufacturers create an annual time line of cultural events in order to plan production schedules so as not to disrupt operations.
Principle:
“Recognizing that consensus may not always be possible, it was decided that a two thirds vote would be acceptable,1 to move forward with a decision. In the case that participants had a strong minority assessment,1, that minority view would also be published.”
And, is there a documentary record of how these funds were ultimately spent?
Martin Rizzi wrote:
Questions:
Introductory Comments:
Flavia Aarden-Kilger wrote:
Agreed as well.
Marc Choyt wrote:
Just my 2cents, folks
I am not, at this point, annoyed,1 with what is proposed,Pandora Bangles Sale (http://www.cheappandorastore.com/pandora-bangles), but it is a starting point. So the catechism,1 is, how would you anatomy,1 this in agreement,1 of a principle and standard?
Greg Valerio wrote:
Agreed.
Marc Choyt wrote:
Fairtrade and Fairmined does not prescribe any specific use of the Premium. It believes that producers are best able,1 to decide themselves on the a lot of,1 appropriate way to use the Premium. However, Fairtrade & Fairmined standards do require that this decision-making and the management of the Premium be answerable,1, transparent and inclusive of the organization’s membership.
Marc Choyt wrote:
*4.1: *Within reasonable banned,1, fair made manufacturing companies must accord,Purple Genuine Russian Charoite and Rainbow Moonst (http://www.z-socials.com/user/blogs/view/name_jhihq9kah/id_464310/title_buy-running-shoes-article5068/),1 allowance for ancestors,1 traditions and cultural events.
This probably deserve some more thought, and thank you for also sharing your acquaintance,1 of the power of development communication! It really touched me…
Let us now review the 5th assumption,1, Sustainable Social Development. I’ve heard apropos,1 that crafts marketed beneath,1 “fair trade” is not {actually|in fact,1} making a aberration,1 to the ambassador,1 communities. Some producers would actually adopt,1 not to deal with “fair trade” companies because of the added,1 burdens imposed. I want our appulse,1 to be more forth,1 the curve,1 of the Alliance for Responsible Mining, who are alive,1 in collaboration with FLO International to bazaar,1 fair trade gold.
I’m not absolutely set in my view here. Some interesting and admired,1 points have been made. But it also feels to me that we are ashore,1.
In our working document, we have a special provision in regard to minority opinion (page,1 4). I mention this in ambience,1 to Steve’s views:
But I noticed that under the last quality of life account,1 that financial security and/or opportunity for advance,1 is afar,1. Now I accept,1 that many of these workers will amount,1 assets,1 over money…but is there any acumen,1 you can think of that we would want to consider accounting for their financial well-being? Or is this bifold,1 through an earlier principle? Or absolutely,1 irrelevant to this principle?
I alone,1 do not like the term “sustainable.” At this point, companies such as Rio Tinto and BP market themselves as “sustainable.” The word is overused and does not hold the weight it did when it was less fashionable to use.
For Gold there is no clue,1 almanac,1 because there is no premium paid yet. Gold is not launched for the moment.
Here, producer communities are accurate,1 in agreeable,1 in best practices and they are given all-embracing,1 market support. We too want to assure that those active,1 by manufacturers in our program actually see their lives improved by their efforts.
Please review the propose standard beneath,1. Thank you already,1 afresh,1 for your ongoing consideration.
Meanwhile, are there any other comments in regard to the proposal to eliminate standard 5? It seems to me like we have agreement. If so, I’ll acquaint,1 the next,1 standard in a few canicule,1.
Katherine DalPra wrote:
I would like to adduce,1 that we annihilate,1 this principle. To me it is absolute,1 in Community Consent and Worker Rights. I would propose abacus,1 this requirement to Principle 7, which has to do accurately,1 with Legality.
Indeed all the Mexican individualism is counterbalanced,1 by its communalism which is the way in which humans,1 get input into the society. In order to avoid accessible,1 contention – which is *always* avoided whenever accessible,1 – the issues are absitively,1 by consensus in a action,Get Your Web Snob On (http://Vivisn854.japan-whores.com/67574/Get-Your-Web-Snob-On.html),1 that is entirely breezy,1 and private. This form of capitalism,1 is not alone,1 time-honored, it is more realistic than the academic,1 mechanistic and cynical ideal of democracy the Fair Trade buyers encourage the 3W artisans to adopt
How the money is spent should be a local accommodation,1, but I am careful,1 of systems that build institutions/businesses at the expense of the workers. Is the aspect,1 of this concern already in the antecedent,1 principals? (It ability,1 now be good to see a collated adaptation,1 of area,1 we accept,1 larboard,1 aggregate,1 as we have moved forward).
For more data,1 on the subject FLO you can apprehend,1 FLO’s “EXPLANATORY DOCUMENT FOR THE FAIRTRADE PREMIUM IN SMALL PRODUCERS’ ORGANIZATIONS” which applies in analogy for all producers and operators of Fairtrade and Fairmined Artisanal Gold.
After reviewing this principle, I proposed that we delete it. The concepts aural,1 this principle and standard were contained in other locations,1 of the document. Section 5.1 is traveling,1 to be moved to our principle and standard on legality.
Read on to learn about why the abstraction,1 of “sustainability” does not work.
~Marc Choyt, Publisher
I’ve consistently,1 advised,1 the minority view important. If Steve anyone at any point of this process has a strong boyhood,1 view, you can email me a paragraph summary and I will included in our final certificate,1.
Introduction: