heiixiuda202
05-24-2011, 06:14 PM
Though you;d in no way know it from reading most of the current iSlate posts and stories, Microsoft truly had a pioneering function within the tablet space. 1 post I saw these days because of a Tweet from my ZDNet blogging colleague Ed Bott) by GottaBeMobile Founder Rob Bushway focuses about the Softies; impact in tablets. Bushway;s conclusion was if your Redmondians don;t alter their methods, 2010 might be the 12 months that Microsoft lost the tablet marketplace.
I;d argue Microsoft already misplaced the first-generation tablet market — because of primarily to lack of marketing, as much as anything else. And I;m not saying that simply for the reason that I, myself,Office Professional 2010 (http://www.msoffice2007key.com/office-2010-key), am not a tablet fan. I;m also not a fan of touch on a PC or anything with a screen bigger than a phone mainly because there;s no reason, other than probably in a kiosk-type setting, that using touch on a PC brings any real benefits to the party.
But Microsoft officials, especially Chairman Bill Gates, have big believers in tablets and touch. They;ve been consumed with finding a way to get these two technologies off the ground and have been willing to keep pouring money and time into research and development to do so. But once they had some promising prototypes and partners in place, they dropped the ball.
Even though many pooh-poohed Microsoft;s Origami/UMPC (ultra-mobile PC) handhelds, in hindsight they don;t look as ridiculous as many originally thought, at least in my opinion. Microsoft actually had some ambitious and interesting plans for Windows-based UMPCs. Here are some with the guidelines Microsoft offered in 2007 to hardware makers interested in building Windows Vista-based UMPCs:
* Five- or seven-inch displays
* Lower-power LED-backlighting
* Screen resolutions of 1024 X 600 (not the 800 x 480 minimum common using the first-wave UMPCs)
* WiMax and integrated WWAN connectivity (supplementingthe existing 802.11 b/g wireless and Bluetooth connected devices)
* New input options, including thumb/QWERTY keyboards, along along with the more-standard touch, stylus and thumb-based controls on latest UMPC models
Microsoft officials were predicting “second-wave” UMPCs would have one GB-plus of RAM, WDDM/DX9+ graphics support; three to four hours of 3-cell battery life; a weight of under one.5 pounds; and 18 to 20 mm thick form factors. Back in 2007, the Softies also were hoping to see UMPCs with $500 price tags.
What a difference a couple of years makes. UMPCs vaporized. Netbooks/ultra thins/e-readers took their place… sort of. And the bottom fell out of the PC marketplace, price-wise, making $500 for UMPC-type device look pricey.
Maybe Microsoft;s big mistake was putting too many eggs within the Windows basket with mobile devices. Why not also offer five-inch devices running Windows Mobile (or some other Windows Compact Edition derivative)?
Again, many seem to have forgotten, but Microsoft has been exploring that possibility. Len Kawell, a Microsoft Distinguished Engineer (and former colleague of Microsoft Chief Software Architect Ray Ozzie) has been looking into the possibilities about Windows-Mobile-based Mobile Internet Devices (MIDs). There;s been no word in the past year as to what;s come of Kawell;s investigations, but there have been public demos of Windows Mobile-based MIDs based on ARM. And with Web apps gaining in prominence, the lack of Windows Mobile apps for non-Intel/AMD processors may not be the deal breaker that it once was….
There;s one other Microsoft project in the works that may have a bearing on Microsoft;s next-generation tablet designs. That;s the “Oahu” Surface knock-off — a “small-ass table” that would be a more affordable, consumer-focused version of Microsoft;s multi-touch table. I;ve heard that Oahu is truly the precursor to the rumored Microsoft Courier tablet (and may be being designed, in part, in Hawaii), but can;t verify this.
Speaking of Courier, that spiffy next-gen touch tablet still seems quite a approaches off, if it ever does move beyond the marketing video stage. But what if there;s a Windows- or Windows Mobile 7-based MID/tablet inside the wings, being built by one of Microsoft;s hardware partners, that can run a more practical, easier-to-learn version of One Note, plus access Web apps, Zune subscription-based music, and (for those who game), Xbox Live? If such a device didn;t force me to go 100 percent touch, I;d be sold!
If Microsoft doesn;t end up fielding something that looks and works exactly like Courier, what features would its next-gen tablet have to include for you to consider it a viable alternative to other tablets/MIDs/netbooks out there?
I;d argue Microsoft already misplaced the first-generation tablet market — because of primarily to lack of marketing, as much as anything else. And I;m not saying that simply for the reason that I, myself,Office Professional 2010 (http://www.msoffice2007key.com/office-2010-key), am not a tablet fan. I;m also not a fan of touch on a PC or anything with a screen bigger than a phone mainly because there;s no reason, other than probably in a kiosk-type setting, that using touch on a PC brings any real benefits to the party.
But Microsoft officials, especially Chairman Bill Gates, have big believers in tablets and touch. They;ve been consumed with finding a way to get these two technologies off the ground and have been willing to keep pouring money and time into research and development to do so. But once they had some promising prototypes and partners in place, they dropped the ball.
Even though many pooh-poohed Microsoft;s Origami/UMPC (ultra-mobile PC) handhelds, in hindsight they don;t look as ridiculous as many originally thought, at least in my opinion. Microsoft actually had some ambitious and interesting plans for Windows-based UMPCs. Here are some with the guidelines Microsoft offered in 2007 to hardware makers interested in building Windows Vista-based UMPCs:
* Five- or seven-inch displays
* Lower-power LED-backlighting
* Screen resolutions of 1024 X 600 (not the 800 x 480 minimum common using the first-wave UMPCs)
* WiMax and integrated WWAN connectivity (supplementingthe existing 802.11 b/g wireless and Bluetooth connected devices)
* New input options, including thumb/QWERTY keyboards, along along with the more-standard touch, stylus and thumb-based controls on latest UMPC models
Microsoft officials were predicting “second-wave” UMPCs would have one GB-plus of RAM, WDDM/DX9+ graphics support; three to four hours of 3-cell battery life; a weight of under one.5 pounds; and 18 to 20 mm thick form factors. Back in 2007, the Softies also were hoping to see UMPCs with $500 price tags.
What a difference a couple of years makes. UMPCs vaporized. Netbooks/ultra thins/e-readers took their place… sort of. And the bottom fell out of the PC marketplace, price-wise, making $500 for UMPC-type device look pricey.
Maybe Microsoft;s big mistake was putting too many eggs within the Windows basket with mobile devices. Why not also offer five-inch devices running Windows Mobile (or some other Windows Compact Edition derivative)?
Again, many seem to have forgotten, but Microsoft has been exploring that possibility. Len Kawell, a Microsoft Distinguished Engineer (and former colleague of Microsoft Chief Software Architect Ray Ozzie) has been looking into the possibilities about Windows-Mobile-based Mobile Internet Devices (MIDs). There;s been no word in the past year as to what;s come of Kawell;s investigations, but there have been public demos of Windows Mobile-based MIDs based on ARM. And with Web apps gaining in prominence, the lack of Windows Mobile apps for non-Intel/AMD processors may not be the deal breaker that it once was….
There;s one other Microsoft project in the works that may have a bearing on Microsoft;s next-generation tablet designs. That;s the “Oahu” Surface knock-off — a “small-ass table” that would be a more affordable, consumer-focused version of Microsoft;s multi-touch table. I;ve heard that Oahu is truly the precursor to the rumored Microsoft Courier tablet (and may be being designed, in part, in Hawaii), but can;t verify this.
Speaking of Courier, that spiffy next-gen touch tablet still seems quite a approaches off, if it ever does move beyond the marketing video stage. But what if there;s a Windows- or Windows Mobile 7-based MID/tablet inside the wings, being built by one of Microsoft;s hardware partners, that can run a more practical, easier-to-learn version of One Note, plus access Web apps, Zune subscription-based music, and (for those who game), Xbox Live? If such a device didn;t force me to go 100 percent touch, I;d be sold!
If Microsoft doesn;t end up fielding something that looks and works exactly like Courier, what features would its next-gen tablet have to include for you to consider it a viable alternative to other tablets/MIDs/netbooks out there?